Tuesday, November 29, 2005

Iraq Troop Withdrawal Would Be 'Huge Mistake,' Bush Says

By Gerry J. Gilmore
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Nov. 29, 2005 - The U.S. commander in chief today dismissed talk of any major withdrawal of American troops from Iraq before victory over insurgents there is achieved.

"We've heard some people say pull them out right now. That's a huge mistake. It'd be a terrible mistake," President Bush told reporters during a visit to U.S. Border Patrol headquarters in El Paso, Texas.

Bush said a precipitous withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq would damage military morale, encourage the enemy, and send a bad message to the Iraqis. "And I want our troops to come home, but I don't want them to come home without having achieved victory," Bush said, noting there's a strategy for victory.

The president said he'd base his decisions about U.S. force levels in Iraq according to recommendations from commanders on the ground.

"If they tell me we need more troops, we'll provide more troops," Bush said. "If they tell me we've got sufficient level of troops, that will be the level of troops."

Bush also said that if U.S. commanders tell him that Iraqi forces are capable of taking on more responsibility to fight the insurgency and that some American troops could therefore come home, then he'd do that.

It's imperative to defeat insurgents operating in Iraq, because they want to make that country into a safe haven, Bush said.

"And a victory in Iraq will deny the terrorists their stated goal," Bush said.

Bush acknowledged that fighting terrorists in Iraq has come with a price. But he vowed that U.S. servicemembers' sacrifices haven't been made in vain.

"We will achieve our objective, which is a stable Iraq, an ally in the war on terror, and we will deny the terrorists safe haven in Iraq," Bush declared.

Iraqis are getting ready for a Dec. 15 nationwide vote to select a 275-member Council of Representatives that will pick Iraq's president and two deputy presidents.

Bush said Iraq's emerging democracy will provide an example of enlightened governance that will resonate across the Middle East.

"And as democracy takes hold in the broader Middle East, we can say we have done our duty and laid the foundation of peace for generations to come," Bush said.

Related Article:

Iraqi Security Forces Steadily Improving, But Still Need Support [http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Nov2005/20051129_3469.html]

_______________________________________________________
NOTE: View the original version of this web page on DefenseLINK,
the official website of the U.S. Department of Defense, at
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Nov2005/20051129_3477.html.

====================================================

Visit the Defense Department's Web site "America Supports You" at http://www.americasupportsyou.mil, that spotlights what Americans are doing in support of U.S. military men and women serving at home and abroad.

====================================================
Visit the Defense Department's Web site for the latest news
and information about America's response to the war against terrorism: "Defend America" at http://www.DefendAmerica.mil.

====================================================

Unsubscribe from or Subscribe to this mailing list:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/subscribe.html
====================================================

Rumsfeld: Quitting No Exit Strategy for Iraq

By Donna Miles
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Nov. 29, 2005 - "Quitting is not an exit strategy" for Iraq and would open a Pandora's box of risks to the American people, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld told Pentagon reporters today.

"It would be a formula for putting more American people at still greater risk (and) an invitation for more terrorist violence," the secretary said.

"Indeed, the more the enemies make it sound as though the United States is going to quit, the more encouraged they will be," Rumsfeld continued. "And the more successful they will be in recruiting and in raising money and in trying to wait us out."

Rather than thinking in terms of an exit strategy, the American people need to focus on the U.S. and coalition strategy for victory, he said. That strategy involves passing responsibility to the Iraqi people and helping them further develop the capabilities needed to take control of their country. "It is their country to lead, and increasingly they are doing so," Rumsfeld said.

President Bush will discuss such a victory strategy during a major speech Nov. 30 at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Md., Rumsfeld noted.

"That strategy is working, and we should stick to it," Rumsfeld said.

The secretary ticked off examples throughout Iraq, particularly within its security framework, that demonstrate progress:

- More than 212,000 Iraqi security forces are fully trained and equipped, up from about 96,000 a year ago;
- Ninety-five Iraqi army battalions are in the fight, compared to five in August 2004;
- Iraq's army has seven operational brigades and 31 operational brigade headquarters, up from zero in July 2004;
- Twenty-eight special police battalions are conducting operations, compared to zero in July 2004;
- U.S. forces have turned over control of 29 military bases to the Iraqis;
- Iraq forces have assumed responsibility for 87 square miles of Baghdad, an entire Iraqi province and 450 square miles of territory in other provinces; and
- More than 5,000 Iraqi troops played a key role in recent operations in Tal Afar, where they helped liberate and secure a terrorist operational base.
But numbers are only part of the story, Rumsfeld said. What's equally important, he said, is the vast experience Iraqi forces continue to gain. They're assuming an ever-increasing role in the country's security and demonstrating a capability some once doubted was possible, he said.

"In short, those who have denigrated the Iraqi security forces have been wrong," the secretary said.

As this trend continues, once-restive areas now under Iraqi military control are experiencing a new sense of peacefulness. Attacks along Baghdad's Airport Road have dropped sharply since an Iraqi police battalion assumed control of it in April. Baghdad's once-violent Haifa Street has become largely peaceful under an Iraqi army battalion's control. Shiite areas of Najaf, Karbala and Sadr City, scenes of bloody encounters in 2004, have dropped from the headlines.

Meanwhile, the Iraqi people are playing a bigger role, too, by reporting insurgent activity to Iraqi and coalition forces, noted Marine Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

In March, a special hotline received fewer than 500 tips, but in October that number surged to 4,700, Pace said. One tip from an Iraqi citizen helped Iraqi and U.S. forces uncover a bomb-making factory Nov. 28, he noted.

"These kinds of tips from the Iraqi populace indicate to me that they understand that the future is with their own armed forces, and, with the help of the coalition, we will help them (realize) that," Pace said.

Rumsfeld acknowledged challenges remain in preparing Iraq's security forces to take full control of Iraq's security as progress continues. More work is needed to develop logistics and administrative capabilities at the brigade, division and ministry levels to fully sustain Iraqi units through the range of combat operations, he said.

Iraq's military still needs to overcome the legacy of the Saddam Hussein era, which Rumsfeld said punished initiative and centralized virtually all decision making.

"Let's be clear," Rumsfeld said. "U.S. forces are in Iraq to help the Iraqis fight the terrorists there so we don't have to fight them here in the United States."

He posed a choice for Americans debating the worthiness of that mission: Would Americans and the world be better off or safer if the United States abandoned its job in Iraq prematurely and allowed terrorists to prevail?

Or, Rumsfeld asked, "would the American people be better if we continue to work with the Iraqi people so they are able to gain in the experience and capabilities that they need to fight and defeat terrorists in their country?"

Biographies:

Donald H. Rumsfeld [http://www.defenselink.mil/bios/rumsfeld_bio.html]

Gen. Peter Pace, USMC [http://www.defenselink.mil/bios/pace_bio.html]

_______________________________________________________
NOTE: View the original version of this web page on DefenseLINK,
the official website of the U.S. Department of Defense, at
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Nov2005/20051129_3478.html.

====================================================

Visit the Defense Department's Web site "America Supports You" at http://www.americasupportsyou.mil, that spotlights what Americans are doing in support of U.S. military men and women serving at home and abroad.

====================================================
Visit the Defense Department's Web site for the latest news
and information about America's response to the war against terrorism: "Defend America" at http://www.DefendAmerica.mil.

====================================================

Unsubscribe from or Subscribe to this mailing list:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/subscribe.html
====================================================

Americans Open Their Hearts to Servicemembers

By Gerry J. Gilmore
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Nov. 29, 2005 - As the traditional gift-giving season gets under way, American people, corporations and service groups are showing their gratitude to American servicemembers, especially those who are deployed, in combat zones, or have been wounded.

"The outpouring from the public of good will, compassion and recognition for the sacrifices of these military personnel is remarkable and very gratifying," said Stephen Epstein, director of the Standards of Conduct Office within DoD's Office of the General Counsel.

However, Epstein added, recent misunderstandings that have been reported in the media have surfaced about what can and can't be donated to servicemembers, including those who've been wounded.

Federal gift-giving rules apply to all servicemembers and their families. There is no distinction between wounded or nonwounded.

In general, military personnel and their family members may accept unsolicited gifts as long as they are not offered because of their official position or from a "prohibited source."

A prohibited source is any person or group that:

Seeks official action from the employee's agency;
Does or seeks to do business with his or her agency;
Conducts activities regulated by his or agency; or
Has interests that may be substantially affected by the individual employee's official duties.

Federal rules define a gift as any gratuity, favor, discount, entertainment, hospitality, loan, forbearance, or other item having monetary value. It also includes services such as training, transportation, local travel, lodging and meals.

"The general rule is that you can't accept gifts from defense contractors," Epstein said, noting such situations may be perceived by the public as attempts to curry favor or influence official decisions. As a result, defense contractors tend to make donations to relief organizations and charitable groups that support the armed forces, he said.

Ethics officials point out that since the rules involve many exemptions and exceptions, military personnel should consult their local judge advocates, legal counsel or ethics officials before accepting gifts.

For example, troops may accept coffee, doughnuts and other food and refreshments offered other than as part of a meal. They may accept greeting cards, plaques, certificates and trophies and other items with little intrinsic value. They also may accept awards and prizes in contests open to the public.

Another exception -- commonly known as the $20 rule -- applies when gifts (other than cash) from a single source have a market value of $20 or less. However, an employee may not accept over $50 in gifts from the same source in a single year.

Troops may receive discounts from commercial companies if the discount is offered to all government or military personnel. Two of the nation's largest home-improvement retailers, Home Depot and Lowe's, for example, recently recognized Veterans Day by offering discounts for all active-duty military, reservists, retirees and their families.

Troops also may accept items provided as "bulk gifts" to the military, such as 100,000 pairs of sunglasses. A service branch or appropriate commander can accept items and then re-distribute them as part of authorized morale, welfare, and recreation activity or patient support service.

DoD personnel may not solicit gifts, even for others, unless the solicitation is part of an official fundraising program, such as the Combined Federal Campaign.

Troops may, however, advise groups, or individuals seeking to assist servicemembers, of their needs. Web sites run by charitable organizations offer troops the opportunity to request specific items to match them with donations. For example, deployed troops in Iraq have identified the need for, and received, air conditioners, boots, DVD players and other items.

The families of deceased DoD personnel, assuming they are not federal employees themselves, are not bound by these rules, Epstein said.

"We have put out guidance, available on our Web site, to assist ethics counselors and commanders in the field so they understand what the rules are as far as accepting gifts," he said. A complete list of rules regarding gifts to servicemembers (http://www.defenselink.mil/dodgc/defense_ethics/dod_oge/gifts_to_servicemembers.doc)
is posted on the site.

Gifts of money to aid military personnel, including deployed or wounded servicemembers and their families, should be made to private relief organizations that provide assistance to affected personnel, officials advised.

These include the Armed Forces Relief Trust (http://www.afrtrust.org), Army Emergency Relief Society (http://www.aerhq.org), Navy & Marine Corps Relief Society (http://www.nmcrs.org), Air Force Aid Society (http://www.asaf.org), and Coast Guard Mutual Assistance (www.cgmahq.org).

Related Sites:

Gifts to Servicemembers [http://www.defenselink.mil/dodgc/defense_ethics/dod_oge/gifts_to_servicemembers.doc]

2005 Deskbook Gifts [http://www.defenselink.mil/dodgc/defense_ethics/resource_library/2005Deskbook/Tab_B_Gifts_Combined_T]

_______________________________________________________
NOTE: View the original version of this web page on DefenseLINK,
the official website of the U.S. Department of Defense, at
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Nov2005/20051129_3475.html.

====================================================

Visit the Defense Department's Web site "America Supports You" at http://www.americasupportsyou.mil, that spotlights what Americans are doing in support of U.S. military men and women serving at home and abroad.

====================================================
Visit the Defense Department's Web site for the latest news
and information about America's response to the war against terrorism: "Defend America" at http://www.DefendAmerica.mil.

====================================================

Unsubscribe from or Subscribe to this mailing list:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/subscribe.html
====================================================

Officials Decry Use of Outdated Images to Portray Gitmo

By Kathleen T. Rhem
American Forces Press Service

U.S. NAVAL STATION GUANTANAMO BAY, Cuba, Nov. 29, 2005 - Leaders at the U.S. detention facility for enemy combatants here wonder why media outlets continue to use outdated images of defunct facilities to accompany news reports about the base.

Media stories about the detention facility or the men held here routinely are accompanied by photographs or video footage shot at Camp X-Ray, a temporary facility hastily erected to deal with enemy combatants captured in the first days of operations in Afghanistan. Images of orange-suited detainees blindfolded and handcuffed and kneeling in a line inside a chain-link enclosure have become iconic.

The problem is that Camp X-Ray closed in early 2002 and hasn't been used since. Since then, detainees have been housed in more modern, comfortable facilities, and improvements continue.

"I'd like to think it's for convenience" that media outlets still use footage that is more than three years old to portray the camp "rather than an attempt to try to portray the camp other than how it is today," Army Brig. Gen. John Gong, deputy commander of Joint Task Force Guantanamo, said in an interview.

"More recent footage better depicts what it's like here today," he added.

Camp X-Ray's concrete slabs and open-air chain-link enclosures had been compared to dog runs. But officials stress Camp X-Ray was a hastily built structure to deal with a rapidly changing situation in the war on terrorism. "It's important to note that Camp X-Ray was thrown up in a matter of weeks," Army Lt. Col. John Lonergan, commander of 1st Battalion, 18th Cavalry Regiment, said. Lonergan's unit provides security at Guantanamo Bay.

The facilities there were never meant to be used for long-term detention, he said. Engineers began construction on Camp Delta, which replaced Camp X-Ray in April 2002, shortly after detainees began arriving here.

Today the formerly occupied Camp X-Ray looks like a ghost town. Weeds and brush have overgrown the enclosures. Heavy rains spawned by three hurricanes at the island base this year have spurred growth of lush greenery throughout the defunct camp. Now the camp looks like it's been swallowed by a jungle.

Detainees in Camp 4, a part of Camp Delta and the least restrictive of the base's detention facilities, live in communal 10-man bays and have nearly full-time access to exercise yards. Gong said officials with the American Correctional Association have looked at Camp Delta and say the facility is in accordance with the standard for modern prisons in the United States.

Camp 5, the newest facility, is designed after state-of-the-art correctional institutions in the United States. Camp 6, to be completed in summer 2006, will be even more modern. When Camp 6 is completed, it and Camp 5 will house 95 percent of the roughly 500 detainees held here now, Gong said.

Media outlets have ample opportunity to update their imagery, Gong said. Since June, more than 40 media agencies have visited the base. "We welcome people to come in," he said.

Related Sites:

U.S. Naval Station Guantanamo Bay, Cuba [http://www.nsgtmo.navy.mil/nsgtmohome.htm]

Joint Task Force Guantanamo [http://www.jtfgtmo.southcom.mil/]

_______________________________________________________
NOTE: View the original version of this web page on DefenseLINK,
the official website of the U.S. Department of Defense, at
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Nov2005/20051129_3476.html.

====================================================

Visit the Defense Department's Web site "America Supports You" at http://www.americasupportsyou.mil, that spotlights what Americans are doing in support of U.S. military men and women serving at home and abroad.

====================================================
Visit the Defense Department's Web site for the latest news
and information about America's response to the war against terrorism: "Defend America" at http://www.DefendAmerica.mil.

====================================================

Unsubscribe from or Subscribe to this mailing list:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/subscribe.html
====================================================

Ukraine to Join Southeastern European Defense Ministerial

By Gerry J. Gilmore
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Nov. 29, 2005 - Next week Ukraine becomes a member of a regional European security organization at a conference that Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld will host here, a senior Defense Department official said today.

The 10th annual Southeastern European Defense Ministerial scheduled Dec. 5 and 6 marks the first time the organization has held its annual meeting in the United States, DoD spokesman Bryan Whitman said. The conference, he said, will be held at a downtown hotel.

"What is historic about this particular meeting," Whitman said, "is that it will mark the accession of Ukraine as a full Southeastern European Defense Ministerial member."

The Washington SEDM conference will provide an opportunity for visiting defense ministers to discuss likely issues such as counterproliferation, border security, peacekeeping, and upcoming regional exercises, Whitman said.

The United States helped to develop SEDM a decade ago, he said, to promote peace and stability and enhance regional security cooperation in southeastern Europe. SEDM's current membership includes Italy, Greece, Turkey, Albania, Bulgaria, Romania, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Slovenia and Croatia.

Some SEDM members, like Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, Italy, Romania, Slovenia, as well as the United States, are also NATO members.

Moldavia and Ukraine had been SEDM conference observers in years past, Whitman said. Special guests at this year's meeting are Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbia-Montenegro, Whitman said, noting Moldavia will attend as an observer.

This year's SEDM chairman is Albanian Deputy Defense Minister Besnik Baraj, Whitman said. The organization's chairmanship rotates annually among the European members, he said.

Related Article:

Rumsfeld to Host Southeastern Europe Defense Ministerial [http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/2005/nr20051129-5168.html]

_______________________________________________________
NOTE: View the original version of this web page on DefenseLINK,
the official website of the U.S. Department of Defense, at
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Nov2005/20051129_3474.html.

====================================================

Visit the Defense Department's Web site "America Supports You" at http://www.americasupportsyou.mil, that spotlights what Americans are doing in support of U.S. military men and women serving at home and abroad.

====================================================
Visit the Defense Department's Web site for the latest news
and information about America's response to the war against terrorism: "Defend America" at http://www.DefendAmerica.mil.

====================================================

Unsubscribe from or Subscribe to this mailing list:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/subscribe.html
====================================================

Terror War Strategy Goes Beyond Iraq and Afghanistan

By Donna Miles
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Nov. 29, 2005 - The threat that led to the global war on terror began festering long before Sept. 11, 2001, and will continue to rage as long as al Qaeda and other like organizations keep spreading their ideology, Army Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt, from U.S. Central Command, said.

Kimmitt, CENTCOM's deputy director for plans and strategy, said the terrorist threat extends well beyond Iraq and Afghanistan. "And that problem set does not go away if we were victorious tomorrow in either Iraq or Afghanistan," he said Nov. 28 at the Heritage Foundation here.

A large network of terrorist organizations is working toward similar ideological goals, he said. "And it's not simply al Qaeda," Kimmitt said. "It's other groups with names such a Jamaah Islamiyah, the Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat, the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan. There is a large network of these organizations virtually connected in some cases, physically connected in others."

All share an ideology that wants to turn the clock back 15 centuries and create a global caliphate, he said. "That is clearly the intention of al Qaeda and its associated movements," Kimmitt said. "It has been said time after time after time."

Military operations alone won't defeat that ideology, Kimmitt acknowledged. It requires broad-based efforts within the U.S. government and those of other nations, as well as a long-term military response.

CENTCOM's strategy to confront this threat "is for a long war" that focuses beyond what Kimmitt called "the narrow lens of Iraq and Afghanistan."

The plan calls for a smaller U.S. footprint in the region and ongoing cooperation with coalition partners committed to fighting terrorism, he said.

The current U.S. force posture in the region "is just too large, and it can't sustain itself over time," Kimmitt said. "So as we talk about the long war, we talk about re-posturing ourselves to a smaller, more expeditionary, more capable force, but one that is drawn from sanctuary to the region as and when needed," he said.

While moving toward this concept, the U.S. military must continue to work with its coalition partners to help them help themselves, he said.

"Our partners need to be at the lead of this fight," Kimmitt said, noting that most understand the challenges ahead and are taking action against terrorists.

Kimmitt cited Jordan's King Abdullah as an example of a partner who is standing up to those challenges. Other examples can be seen in Kuwait and Egypt, he said.

"So as we continue to help our partners help themselves, we believe that this is one of the fundamental strategies going forward," he said.

CENTCOM's overall strategy - taking the fight forward rather than allowing terrorists to strike the U.S., re-posturing U.S. forces over time, helping partners help themselves as they stand up to terrorists and denying terrorists safe havens and sanctuaries - is essential to the success of the long war against terror, Kimmitt said.

Related Site:

U.S. Central Command [http://www.centcom.mil/]

_______________________________________________________
NOTE: View the original version of this web page on DefenseLINK,
the official website of the U.S. Department of Defense, at
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Nov2005/20051129_3472.html.

====================================================

Visit the Defense Department's Web site "America Supports You" at http://www.americasupportsyou.mil, that spotlights what Americans are doing in support of U.S. military men and women serving at home and abroad.

====================================================
Visit the Defense Department's Web site for the latest news
and information about America's response to the war against terrorism: "Defend America" at http://www.DefendAmerica.mil.

====================================================

Unsubscribe from or Subscribe to this mailing list:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/subscribe.html
====================================================

Burning Afghan Bodies Resulted From Poor Judgment, Not War Crimes

By Kathleen T. Rhem
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Nov. 29, 2005 - The decision by U.S. soldiers to burn the bodies of two enemy Afghan fighters was an act of poor judgment, but not a violation of the laws of war, U.S. officials have determined.

Officials also determined that using the act to incite Taliban fighters by announcing it over psychological operations loudspeakers was a separate act. In all, four soldiers have received administrative punishment in the two incidents.

"Based on the criminal investigation, there was no evidence to substantiate the allegation of desecration or any violation of the Law of War," according to an executive summary of the official investigation report from Combined Joint Task Force 76. "However, there was evidence of poor decision-making and judgment, poor reporting and lack of knowledge and respect for local Afghan customs and tradition."

The executive summary was released to the media Nov. 26.

The report refers to an investigation into a widely reported incident Oct. 1 in Gumbad, Afghanistan, in which U.S. soldiers burned the bodies of two enemy fighters and psychological operations forces announced the burning to incite Taliban fighters.

Coalition forces know the location as an area of enemy activity, officials said. A Sept. 30 engagement killed two enemy fighters, and local citizens had not retrieved the bodies 24 hours later. An officer on the ground decided it best to burn the bodies for hygienic reasons.

When apprised of the act, the unit's battalion commander ordered the bodies extinguished. The troops on the ground complied immediately. However, a psychological operations team operating in the area heard of the incident via local tactical radio traffic and broadcasted information about it toward the village and toward local mountains in which enemy forces were suspected of hiding.

As a result of this investigation, four soldiers were reprimanded. Two of them, the PSYOPS specialists, received "nonjudicial punishment," administrative punishment imposed by a commander for wrongdoing that doesn't rise to a criminal level. Such punishment can result in fines, extra duties and short-term confinement, but no details were released on the extent of circumstances in this incident.

"These were all nonjudicial, administrative actions that were taken," Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said today.

The investigation found the soldiers decided to burn the bodies believing it was the best course of action and knowing cremation of enemy remains is allowed under the Geneva Conventions. "The soldiers at Gumbad did not have a thorough knowledge of the local Afghan traditions with respect to burial," the report summary states. "This incident was the first time that this unit had killed enemy combatants at close range and had to determine what to do with the remains."

Islamic custom forbids cremation. Task force officials acknowledge the burning was wrong and have ordered training on Afghan sensitivities for all troops in the command, officials said.

Regarding the loudspeaker broadcasts, investigating officials found no evidence that the bodies were burned for the psychological effect. However, the report states, the broadcasts were "in violation of standing policies for the content of loudspeaker messages."

The operator and his supervisor have been reassigned to other duties, officials said.

"CJTF 76 investigations identified two separate but related incidents that highlighted poor judgment and a lack of Afghan cultural knowledge - not Law of War violations," officials said in the investigation report summary. "The judgment errors are serious and have been corrected with administrative action and training."

(American Forces Press Service writer Gerry J. Gilmore contributed to this report.)

Related Sites:

Combined Forces Command Afghanistan [http://www.cfc-a.centcom.mil/]

Executive Summary of Investigation Report [http://www.cfc-a.centcom.mil/News%20Release/Nov05/Investigation%20into%20the%20Gumbad%20Incident.pdf]

Related Article:

U.S. Investigates Misconduct Allegation in Afghanistan [http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Oct2005/20051020_3098.html]

_______________________________________________________
NOTE: View the original version of this web page on DefenseLINK,
the official website of the U.S. Department of Defense, at
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Nov2005/20051129_3471.html.

====================================================

Visit the Defense Department's Web site "America Supports You" at http://www.americasupportsyou.mil, that spotlights what Americans are doing in support of U.S. military men and women serving at home and abroad.

====================================================
Visit the Defense Department's Web site for the latest news
and information about America's response to the war against terrorism: "Defend America" at http://www.DefendAmerica.mil.

====================================================

Unsubscribe from or Subscribe to this mailing list:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/subscribe.html
====================================================

Iraqi Security Forces Steadily Improving, But Still Need Support

By Donna Miles
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Nov. 29, 2005 - U.S. and coalition initiatives to create well-trained and -equipped Iraqi security forces are paying off, with Iraqis taking on more of the fight, a U.S. Central Command general said Nov. 28 at the Heritage Foundation here.

"Iraqi security forces are fighting hard. They're fighting well. They are not cracking under pressure, as you see in some armies, and they are making a tremendous contribution," Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt, CENTCOM's deputy director of plans and strategy, told the audience.

Kimmitt, who divides his time between Iraq and CENTCOM's Tampa headquarters, said Iraq's security forces, which now number about 200,000, are steadily improving in capability.

They're taking on more of the fight, as evidenced during recent operations in Tal Afar and in the Euphrates River Valley, he said.

"We believe that that is generally the operational concept that we've been working toward," Kimmitt said. "It's starting to pay fruit now."

But Kimmitt acknowledged that the Iraqis' competency levels vary widely, and they're not yet ready to handle fight alone, without coalition help. "I'm not one to stand here and suggest that means they can handle the entire responsibility for military operations in Iraq, and it will be some time before they are able to," he said.

For now, as they steadily gain capability, Iraq's security forces are demonstrating their mettle, not just in combat missions, but also in the all-important follow-on operations, he said. This involves bringing in rebuilding supplies, medical help and other services to help affected communities return to normalcy.

It also prevents insurgents from returning, preventing what Kimmitt described as a "whack-a-mole" operational concept: "fight them here, then fight them here, then fight them here."

Rather, he said, combined coalition and Iraqi forces can move on to the next location to root out insurgents while Iraqi security forces remain behind to help maintain stability.

"So the military comes in solely for the purpose of targeting the insurgents," he said. "When that is done, it is hoped that we can quickly turn it over to legitimate local governance as quickly as possible."

Kimmitt praised the U.S. servicemembers who are making these advances possible.

"They are absolutely magnificent. They take your breath away. They are courageous, they are brave, and they are dedicated to their mission," he said. "They are fighting an enemy that shows no restraint or follows no conventional rules, and our troops, by contrast, are well-led."

U.S. troops know they have the support of their friends, families and the American public, he said.

And although they're well aware of the ongoing debate about U.S. operations in Iraq, the troops are proud to serve in a country that allows this type public discourse, Kimmitt said.

"Rest assured that they're not only the best military we've ever had, but they also are a military that is deeply rooted in the democratic traditions of civilian control," he said. "They are doing their duty in Iraq and Afghanistan and a thousand other places around the world tonight."

Related Site:

U.S. Central Command [http://www.centcom.mil/]

_______________________________________________________
NOTE: View the original version of this web page on DefenseLINK,
the official website of the U.S. Department of Defense, at
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Nov2005/20051129_3469.html.

====================================================

Visit the Defense Department's Web site "America Supports You" at http://www.americasupportsyou.mil, that spotlights what Americans are doing in support of U.S. military men and women serving at home and abroad.

====================================================
Visit the Defense Department's Web site for the latest news
and information about America's response to the war against terrorism: "Defend America" at http://www.DefendAmerica.mil.

====================================================

Unsubscribe from or Subscribe to this mailing list:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/subscribe.html
====================================================

Two Soldiers Killed, One Injured in Separate Incidents

American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Nov. 29, 2005 - Two Task Force Baghdad soldiers were killed when their patrol struck a roadside bomb north of Baghdad today, military officials reported.

The soldiers' names are being withheld pending notification of family.

In other news, a crewmember suffered minor injuries when a Bradley fighting vehicle struck a roadside bomb Nov. 28 in eastern Baghdad. The crewmember was treated and quickly returned to duty, officials said.

Elements of 1st Battalion, 64th Armor, and Iraqi police secured the area to prevent injury to nearby civilians.

"We have gathered some intelligence on who might be responsible, and we are working the issue right now with the Iraqi security forces and the local citizens to catch the responsible terrorists," said Army Col. Joseph DiSalvo, commander of coalition forces in eastern Baghdad. "The terrorists are willing to put innocent civilians at risk when they attack us. It is important that local civilians continue to turn in suspected terrorists to the Iraqi security forces."

Coalition and Iraqi security forces discovered several weapons caches across Iraq on Nov. 28.

As Iraqi and U.S. forces in Kirkuk continue unearthing weapons from a major cache discovered Nov. 27, several smaller caches were discovered around the north central region, officials said.

Iraqi police and soldiers joined troops from the 101st Airborne Division's 1st Brigade Combat Team to continue the systematic excavation and securing of a large cache unearthed outside an abandoned military base near Kirkuk. Several thousand mortar rounds already have been removed from the site.

A local resident led coalition troops to a weapons cache near Bayji. Soldiers found 18 large mortar rounds, 90 pounds of powdered explosives, a rocket motor and some small-arms ammunition. The rounds and explosives were taken away for disposal.

In the village of Shumayt, near Haqija, Iraqi and U.S. soldiers turned up a small amount of plastic explosives, some anti-aircraft artillery rounds, five assault weapons, sniper ammunition, and 200 rounds of armor-piercing ammunition.

A patrol operating from Logistics Support Area Anaconda near Balad discovered another collection of weapons. Soldiers seized hundreds of rounds of small-arms ammunition, four small rockets, 15 assault weapons and two night-vision scopes.

During the past week, Iraqi army soldiers and U.S. Marines, soldiers and sailors of the 2nd Marine Division also discovered 66 weapons caches in Iraq's Anbar province.

U.S. and Iraqi forces found blocks of plastic explosives, sticks of TNT, artillery and mortar rounds used in vehicle and roadside bombs along with remote detonators. They also discovered machine guns, assault and sniper rifles, rocket-propelled grenades and munitions.

In Haqlaniyah on Nov. 27, Iraqi soldiers and Marines excavated more than 8,800 heavy-machine-gun rounds along with 150 artillery, mortar and tank rounds. Information gained from local citizens indicated that the cache was buried about a month ago by three carloads of people working through the night.

Near Habbaniyah, four complete mortar systems, including their aiming sites and instruction manuals and more than a dozen remote detonators for roadside bombs, were found. Thirteen men were detained at the site for further questioning.

Caches were found and destroyed from Fallujah to Qaim. Many of these weapons and explosive cache sites were located after receiving information from local citizens, officials said.

Iraqi and coalition forces prevented two bombings in and around Baghdad on Nov. 26.

A citizen in Sadr City provided a potentially life-saving tip to the Iraqi army on Nov. 26, alerting them to what appeared to be a bomb placed in the road.

The Iraqi army and soldiers from Task Force Baghdad's 3rd Battalion, 15th Infantry, responded and secured the site. Upon investigation, the Iraqi army and Task Force Baghdad team discovered a 122 mm mortar round rigged with a remote detonating device. A U.S. Army explosive ordnance disposal team disposed of the bomb.

West of Baghdad, in the Abu Ghraib area, Task Force Baghdad soldiers killed a terrorist trying to set up an improvised explosive device Nov. 26.

Soldiers from 1st Squadron, 11th Armored Cavalry, spotted the bomber trying to put a 155 mm artillery round, with an attached detonation device, into a pile of trash along the street. The soldiers quickly engaged the individual.

Iraqi army soldiers from 2nd Battalion, 3rd Brigade, 6th Division, secured the area and explosive experts destroyed the bomb.

In the skies over Iraq, coalition aircraft flew 52 close-air-support missions on Nov. 28. These missions included support to coalition troops, infrastructure protection, reconstruction activities, and operations to deter and disrupt terrorist activities.

Eleven U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft flew missions in support of operations in Iraq. The U.S. Air Force and British Royal Air Force fighter aircraft also performed in a nontraditional ISR role with their electro-optical and infrared sensors.

(Compiled from Multinational Force Iraq, Task Force Baghdad and U.S. Central Command Air Forces Forward news releases.)

Related Sites:

Multinational Force Iraq [http://www.mnf-iraq.com/]

U.S. Central Command Air Forces [http://www.centaf.af.mil/]

_______________________________________________________
NOTE: View the original version of this web page on DefenseLINK,
the official website of the U.S. Department of Defense, at
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Nov2005/20051129_3468.html.

====================================================

Visit the Defense Department's Web site "America Supports You" at http://www.americasupportsyou.mil, that spotlights what Americans are doing in support of U.S. military men and women serving at home and abroad.

====================================================
Visit the Defense Department's Web site for the latest news
and information about America's response to the war against terrorism: "Defend America" at http://www.DefendAmerica.mil.

====================================================

Unsubscribe from or Subscribe to this mailing list:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/subscribe.html
====================================================

U.S. Helping Colombian Military Cope With Drug War's Legacy

By Kathleen T. Rhem
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Nov. 29, 2005 - While U.S. servicemembers are in the Middle East fighting the war on terrorism, Colombia is fighting its own war against terrorists -- narco-traffickers and violent militias that support them in the country's mountainous rural areas.

The U.S. military is helping to train Colombian forces to deal with these violent groups and providing support in other ways, but stopping short of actually getting involved in military action in the country's triple-canopy jungles.

"The Colombian army is on the offensive for the first time," Steve Lucas, a spokesman for U.S. Southern Command here, said.

Under the Colombian government's "Plan Patriota," the country's military is making advances against armed groups used to operating unmolested in ungoverned areas of Colombia where drug trafficking has thrived. The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia - called FARC from the Spanish "Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia" -and the National Liberation Army - called ELN from "Ej�rcito de Liberaci�n Nacional" - are the main guerrilla groups operating in Colombia's rural areas. Other guerrilla, paramilitary and criminal groups also pose threats.

The U.S. military has provided training assistance for decades. Currently aid to Colombia consists of about 200 trainers and about 200 other troops providing "information support" in the form of reconnaissance support and leadership and planning guidance. Until early fiscal 2005, Congress had imposed a 400-troop cap on U.S. forces in Colombia. The cap is now 800 servicemembers.

No U.S. troops or advisers operate with Colombian operational forces, Lucas said. "U.S. involvement is limited to training in garrison and planning support to headquarters elements," he explained.

U.S. soldiers from the 7th Special Forces Group provide most of the training, Lucas said. "They are expert land warriors with extensive training in the region," he said.

U.S. forces provide training on command and staff procedures, basic soldier skills, and "riverine capabilities," among other areas, he said. Riverine capabilities in warfare are employed when a waterway is the main line of communication and transportation, such as in dense jungles.

Lucas added that the 7th Group soldiers often come away feeling a kinship with the Colombian troops they train, calling them "brothers in arms."

"They know they're fighting for their countrymen," he said.

The U.S. objective is to train Colombian military trainers, so they can, in turn, train the bulk of their country's forces. "This is the Colombians' war to win, not our war," Lucas said.

The U.S. State Department carefully vets Colombian units that receive U.S. aid for substantiated human-rights violations, officials said.

"They're making a lot of progress regaining their country because of the training we've been able to provide," Air Force Maj. Gen. Richard Mentemeyer, SOUTHCOM's deputy commander, said.

U.S.-provided medical training for Colombia's military forces has paid huge dividends. In recent years the Colombian military has seen its "death-from-wounds rate" drop from nearly 100 percent to about 30 percent, largely because of combat-medic training provided by U.S. Special Forces soldiers.

U.S. Southern Command has also helped the Colombian military set up a sergeants major academy to help train a professional noncommissioned officer corps. "We're working extensively with them to develop an NCO corps," Army Command Sgt. Maj. Michael Balch, SOUTHCOM's senior enlisted advisor, said.

Balch said the Colombians have so far run four iterations of the 10-week course, with 35 to 60 people in each course. They have also opened it up to members of other Latin American countries' militaries. The Honduran sergeant major of the army and a Bolivian NCO have graduated from the course, Balch said.

"(The academy) is clearly improving the morale of their professional enlisted force," Balch said. "They have role models and something to aspire to."

It's in the United States' best interest to provide training help to Colombia's forces so they can counter internal guerrilla, paramilitary and criminal groups, because more stable neighbors improve American security, SOUTHCOM officials said.

Helping Latin American countries deal with their internal problems is also important because international criminal groups are natural bedfellows for terrorists targeting U.S. interests. Trafficking in undocumented immigrants and weapons can add to the terrorist threat in the United States.

For example, between January and June 2004, Mexico deported about 130 Ethiopians transiting Mexico to get to the United States, Nicaraguan Defense Minister Avil Ramirez Valdivia said Oct. 12 during a meeting of Central American defense ministers in South Florida. Roughly the same number of people from each Costa Rica and Belize were also deported from Mexico trying to reach the United States.

This is an example of how many undocumented people from other parts of the world work to enter the U.S. through Latin America. "This shows very clearly how these networks of gangs, drug traffickers, alien traffickers can lead to ... terrorism," Ramirez said.

Lucas also said the United States has a moral obligation to help Colombia deal with its internal terrorist groups, since the United States "is the largest market for cocaine, the flow of which is corrupting their society."

The vast majority of the world's cocaine comes from the "Andean Ridge," consisting of the countries of Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia, all linked by the immense Andes mountain chain.

Any efforts to help the Colombians also help to stem the flow of illegal drugs into the United States. "In terms of impact on society, illegal drugs could be called weapons of mass destruction," Lucas said. It's hard to quantify (the impact): crime, affect to families, the increase in the prison population."

Finally, the United States needs to help nations in Latin America develop their professional militaries, because if the U.S. doesn't, then other countries will, Balch said. U.S. officials have seen evidence of China, Venezuela and Cuba providing military aid in the region. "We want to be the partner of choice in the region," Balch said.

During a visit to the command Nov. 21, Army Command Sgt. Maj. William J. Gainey, newly appointed senior enlisted advisor to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, praised SOUTHCOM for its efforts on behalf of the Colombian military and throughout Latin America and urged patience in the face of sometimes slow progress.

"You're breaking ground here," Gainey said. "You know how you eat an elephant, right? One small bite at a time."

Biographies:

Maj. Gen. Richard Mentemeyer, USAF [http://www.af.mil/bios/bio.asp?bioID=6447]

Command Sgt. Maj. William J. Gainey, USA [http://www.jcs.mil/bios/bio_gainey.html]

Related Site:

U.S. Southern Command [http://www.southcom.mil/]

_______________________________________________________
NOTE: View the original version of this web page on DefenseLINK,
the official website of the U.S. Department of Defense, at
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Nov2005/20051129_3467.html.

====================================================

Visit the Defense Department's Web site "America Supports You" at http://www.americasupportsyou.mil, that spotlights what Americans are doing in support of U.S. military men and women serving at home and abroad.

====================================================
Visit the Defense Department's Web site for the latest news
and information about America's response to the war against terrorism: "Defend America" at http://www.DefendAmerica.mil.

====================================================

Unsubscribe from or Subscribe to this mailing list:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/subscribe.html
====================================================